![]() |
Lomo Fisheye two |
As
far as I can remember (going by recent events that’s a bit dubious)
this film is about seven years out of date. With this in mind you
would of thought I should have picked a camera that allowed ISO
adjustments. I didn't! Lomo's fisheye 2 was the camera chosen meaning
that the HP5+ would have to be exposed at box speed (400 iso) Unlike
a lot of people I don't have a problem with box speed and anyway it
is in the best tradition of the toy camera cult along with Light leaking
cameras, plastic lens, unpredictable focus and a lot of fun.
![]() |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d93/a8d9363a3f6bcadf8f4475f43b26bbe7bf364be3" alt=""
After
all these years I still get the little bit of apprehension as I do a
quick check of the film just before the wash stage. I need not have
worried as I remove the reel from the developing tank I can just make
out a line of rectangles along the film. The proof of the pudding
will be when I print them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fe35/0fe3521816618d2645af24aaf89a40a2b7209ab4" alt=""
I am very pleased with the way these negatives have printed. There is no sign of grain even though they have been enlarged to fit 9.5”x12” paper. I have used Silverproof matt paper at grade three and processed in Moersch 6 blue tone developer. Which produces a rich blue black that does not translate very well from scanned pictures.